CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(20) Afold
MCC 0.620 > 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.634 ± 0.242 > 0.593 ± 0.238
Sensitivity 0.581 < 0.591
Positive Predictive Value 0.667 > 0.547
Total TP 176 < 179
Total TN 42244 > 42181
Total FP 111 < 190
Total FP CONTRA 43 < 51
Total FP INCONS 45 < 97
Total FP COMP 23 < 42
Total FN 127 > 124
P-value 1.19853615606e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Afold).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 176
Total TN 42244
Total FP 111
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 127
Total Scores
MCC 0.620
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.634 ± 0.242
Sensitivity 0.581
Positive Predictive Value 0.667
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.88 0.86 0.90 19 1087 2 0 2 0 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 882 1 1 0 0 3
3IZ4_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 54 25455 38 13 14 11 41
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2272 6 1 5 0 37
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.30 11 4727 29 15 11 3 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 179
Total TN 42181
Total FP 190
Total FP CONTRA 51
Total FP INCONS 97
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 124
Total Scores
MCC 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.593 ± 0.238
Sensitivity 0.591
Positive Predictive Value 0.547
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.46 0.50 0.44 11 1083 14 3 11 0 11
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1088 23 4 19 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.