CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(20) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(20) MCFold
MCC 0.694 > 0.506
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.688 ± 0.163 > 0.492 ± 0.144
Sensitivity 0.662 > 0.546
Positive Predictive Value 0.735 > 0.482
Total TP 194 > 160
Total TN 22748 > 22680
Total FP 84 < 208
Total FP CONTRA 36 < 51
Total FP INCONS 34 < 121
Total FP COMP 14 < 36
Total FN 99 < 133
P-value 2.02510705504e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(20) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(20) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 194
Total TN 22748
Total FP 84
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 99
Total Scores
MCC 0.694
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.688 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.662
Positive Predictive Value 0.735
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.88 0.86 0.90 19 1087 2 0 2 0 3
3GX2_A 0.40 0.21 0.75 6 1441 2 1 1 0 22
3IVN_B 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 882 1 1 0 0 3
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.30 11 4727 29 15 11 3 11
3PDR_A 0.80 0.70 0.92 35 4802 5 1 2 2 15
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
3SD1_A 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1501 7 5 2 0 4
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 6 487 3 0 3 0 9

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 160
Total TN 22680
Total FP 208
Total FP CONTRA 51
Total FP INCONS 121
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 133
Total Scores
MCC 0.506
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.492 ± 0.144
Sensitivity 0.546
Positive Predictive Value 0.482
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3GX2_A 0.58 0.61 0.57 17 1419 15 1 12 2 11
3IVN_B 0.45 0.48 0.46 11 879 14 5 8 1 12
3JYV_7 0.25 0.30 0.24 6 1086 20 8 11 1 14
3LA5_A 0.44 0.44 0.48 11 931 12 2 10 0 14
3O58_3 0.28 0.36 0.22 8 4727 39 14 15 10 14
3PDR_A 0.78 0.80 0.77 40 4788 14 5 7 2 10
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.