CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(seed) & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(seed) Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.384 > 0.104
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.339 ± 0.186 > 0.033 ± 0.072
Sensitivity 0.227 > 0.011
Positive Predictive Value 0.664 < 1.000
Total TP 83 > 4
Total TN 26411 < 26532
Total FP 43 > 0
Total FP CONTRA 4 > 0
Total FP INCONS 38 > 0
Total FP COMP 1 > 0
Total FN 282 < 361
P-value 2.41358941668e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(seed) and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(seed) and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(seed) and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(seed) and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(seed) and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 83
Total TN 26411
Total FP 43
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 282
Total Scores
MCC 0.384
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.339 ± 0.186
Sensitivity 0.227
Positive Predictive Value 0.664
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
3A3A_A 0.53 0.37 0.79 11 1486 3 0 3 0 19
3GX2_A 0.42 0.21 0.86 6 1442 1 0 1 0 22
3IVN_B 0.81 0.70 0.94 16 886 1 1 0 0 7
3LA5_A 0.82 0.68 1.00 17 937 0 0 0 0 8
3NPB_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2274 4 0 4 0 37
3O58_3 0.28 0.14 0.60 3 4759 2 0 2 0 19
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4832 8 0 8 0 50
3RKF_A 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 847 1 1 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4512 5 2 2 1 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.21 0.86 6 1430 1 0 1 0 23
4ENB_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 467 2 0 2 0 12
4ENC_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 491 2 0 2 0 12

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 4
Total TN 26532
Total FP 0
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 361
Total Scores
MCC 0.104
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.033 ± 0.072
Sensitivity 0.011
Positive Predictive Value 1.000
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.22 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 14
3A3A_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1500 0 0 0 0 30
3GX2_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1449 0 0 0 0 28
3IVN_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 23
3LA5_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 954 0 0 0 0 25
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2278 0 0 0 0 37
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4764 0 0 0 0 22
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4840 0 0 0 0 50
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.