CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.618 > 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.626 ± 0.226 > 0.565 ± 0.318
Sensitivity 0.573 > 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.677 > 0.602
Total TP 86 > 80
Total TN 9721 > 9715
Total FP 54 < 66
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 17
Total FP INCONS 27 < 36
Total FP COMP 13 = 13
Total FN 64 < 70
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 86
Total TN 9721
Total FP 54
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 27
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 64
Total Scores
MCC 0.618
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.626 ± 0.226
Sensitivity 0.573
Positive Predictive Value 0.677
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 0 5 0 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.78 0.72 0.84 21 1508 4 2 2 0 8
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 34 8 14 12 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 9715
Total FP 66
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 36
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 70
Total Scores
MCC 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.565 ± 0.318
Sensitivity 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.602
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.