CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for UNAFold & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric UNAFold PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.536 > 0.155
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.523 ± 0.330 > 0.084 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.533 > 0.047
Positive Predictive Value 0.552 > 0.538
Total TP 80 > 7
Total TN 9703 < 9835
Total FP 83 > 25
Total FP CONTRA 22 > 0
Total FP INCONS 43 > 6
Total FP COMP 18 < 19
Total FN 70 < 143
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of UNAFold and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 9703
Total FP 83
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 43
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 70
Total Scores
MCC 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.523 ± 0.330
Sensitivity 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.552
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 11 17 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 7
Total TN 9835
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 143
Total Scores
MCC 0.155
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.084 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.047
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.33 0.75 6 520 2 0 2 0 12
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.