CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for UNAFold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric UNAFold RNAwolf
MCC 0.531 > 0.436
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.523 ± 0.238 > 0.421 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.541 > 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.535 > 0.452
Total TP 99 > 80
Total TN 11350 < 11358
Total FP 105 < 114
Total FP CONTRA 30 > 22
Total FP INCONS 56 < 75
Total FP COMP 19 > 17
Total FN 84 < 103
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of UNAFold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 99
Total TN 11350
Total FP 105
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 56
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 84
Total Scores
MCC 0.531
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.523 ± 0.238
Sensitivity 0.541
Positive Predictive Value 0.535
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.64 0.50 7 397 8 5 2 1 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 11 17 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 11358
Total FP 114
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 103
Total Scores
MCC 0.436
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.421 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.452
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.14 2 397 13 4 8 1 9
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3U4M_B - 0.50 0.50 0.52 11 1255 12 1 9 2 11
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.