CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Vsfold5 & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Vsfold5 RNAwolf
MCC 0.461 > 0.436
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.487 ± 0.293 > 0.421 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.470 > 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.470 > 0.452
Total TP 86 > 80
Total TN 11352 < 11358
Total FP 115 > 114
Total FP CONTRA 26 > 22
Total FP INCONS 71 < 75
Total FP COMP 18 > 17
Total FN 97 < 103
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Vsfold5 and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Vsfold5 and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 86
Total TN 11352
Total FP 115
Total FP CONTRA 26
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 97
Total Scores
MCC 0.461
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.487 ± 0.293
Sensitivity 0.470
Positive Predictive Value 0.470
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 4 1 1 7
3RKF_A 0.90 0.92 0.88 22 841 3 3 0 0 2
3SD1_A 0.13 0.14 0.15 4 1507 22 5 17 0 25
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.28 8 4487 37 8 13 16 12
4AOB_A 0.21 0.21 0.25 6 1413 19 2 16 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 11358
Total FP 114
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 103
Total Scores
MCC 0.436
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.421 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.452
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.14 2 397 13 4 8 1 9
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3U4M_B - 0.50 0.50 0.52 11 1255 12 1 9 2 11
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.