CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.586 > 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.630 ± 0.171 > 0.446 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.520 > 0.267
Positive Predictive Value 0.665 < 0.774
Total TP 173 > 89
Total TN 57109 < 57254
Total FP 129 > 28
Total FP CONTRA 13 > 5
Total FP INCONS 74 > 21
Total FP COMP 42 > 2
Total FN 160 < 244
P-value 2.41358941668e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 173
Total TN 57109
Total FP 129
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 74
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 160
Total Scores
MCC 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.630 ± 0.171
Sensitivity 0.520
Positive Predictive Value 0.665
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 89
Total TN 57254
Total FP 28
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 244
Total Scores
MCC 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.446 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.267
Positive Predictive Value 0.774
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.52 0.27 1.00 3 403 0 0 0 0 8
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3A3A_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 12 3643 0 0 0 0 25
3IVN_B 0.53 0.39 0.75 12 2330 4 2 2 0 19
3JYX_4 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12241 4 0 2 2 30
3LA5_A 0.58 0.41 0.82 14 2468 3 1 2 0 20
3NPB_A 0.49 0.28 0.87 13 7006 2 1 1 0 33
3O58_3 0.45 0.20 1.00 7 12396 0 0 0 0 28
3RKF_A 0.53 0.35 0.80 12 2196 3 1 2 0 22
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.