CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RNAalifold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RNAalifold(seed)
MCC 0.519 > 0.483
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.619 ± 0.149 > 0.462 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.485 > 0.288
Positive Predictive Value 0.558 < 0.814
Total TP 280 > 166
Total TN 189330 < 189628
Total FP 269 > 47
Total FP CONTRA 47 > 11
Total FP INCONS 175 > 27
Total FP COMP 47 > 9
Total FN 297 < 411
P-value 1.61358433984e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RNAalifold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAalifold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAalifold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RNAalifold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAalifold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 280
Total TN 189330
Total FP 269
Total FP CONTRA 47
Total FP INCONS 175
Total FP COMP 47
Total FN 297
Total Scores
MCC 0.519
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.619 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.485
Positive Predictive Value 0.558
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60616 82 23 55 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top



Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 166
Total TN 189628
Total FP 47
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 27
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 411
Total Scores
MCC 0.483
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.462 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.288
Positive Predictive Value 0.814
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.52 0.27 1.00 3 403 0 0 0 0 8
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 861 0 0 0 0 18
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3A3A_A 0.71 0.51 1.00 19 3636 0 0 0 0 18
3IVN_B 0.61 0.48 0.79 15 2327 4 2 2 0 16
3IYQ_A 0.38 0.21 0.69 20 60697 13 5 4 4 74
3IZ4_A 0.42 0.21 0.85 28 70843 5 1 4 0 104
3JYX_4 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 12239 2 0 0 2 26
3LA5_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2466 3 1 2 0 18
3NPB_A 0.66 0.48 0.92 22 6997 3 1 1 1 24
3O58_3 0.51 0.26 1.00 9 12394 0 0 0 0 26
3RKF_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2192 3 1 2 0 18
4A1C_2 0.39 0.15 1.00 5 11776 2 0 0 2 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.