CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RNAsubopt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RNAsubopt
MCC 0.528 > 0.522
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.525 ± 0.092 > 0.512 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.478 > 0.474
Positive Predictive Value 0.587 > 0.579
Total TP 643 > 638
Total TN 276180 > 276173
Total FP 522 > 517
Total FP CONTRA 67 < 72
Total FP INCONS 385 < 392
Total FP COMP 70 > 53
Total FN 702 < 707
P-value 3.53079410487e-06

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RNAsubopt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAsubopt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAsubopt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RNAsubopt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAsubopt).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 643
Total TN 276180
Total FP 522
Total FP CONTRA 67
Total FP INCONS 385
Total FP COMP 70
Total FN 702
Total Scores
MCC 0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.525 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.478
Positive Predictive Value 0.587
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 622 8 0 8 0 20
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
2RP0_A - 0.58 0.42 0.83 5 345 1 0 1 0 7
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.18 0.15 0.24 4 1936 13 0 13 0 22
2WW9_E - 0.47 0.29 0.80 4 556 1 0 1 0 10
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.25 6 3462 18 0 18 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.80 0.74 0.87 20 2462 3 0 3 0 7
3A2K_C 0.41 0.39 0.44 11 2901 14 2 12 0 17
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3ADB_C - 0.78 0.74 0.82 28 4152 6 0 6 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.16 0.14 0.19 4 2680 17 2 15 0 24
3AM1_B - 0.72 0.66 0.79 23 3211 6 0 6 0 12
3G4S_9 0.48 0.35 0.67 20 7351 11 1 9 1 37
3GCA_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 519 9 0 9 0 17
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.62 0.58 0.68 19 4250 9 0 9 0 14
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60616 82 23 55 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1210 15 1 14 0 17
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2827 23 1 22 0 32
3JYX_3 0.54 0.56 0.54 15 6300 24 1 12 11 12
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3KTW_C - 0.71 0.63 0.82 27 4527 7 2 4 1 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top



Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 638
Total TN 276173
Total FP 517
Total FP CONTRA 72
Total FP INCONS 392
Total FP COMP 53
Total FN 707
Total Scores
MCC 0.522
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.512 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.474
Positive Predictive Value 0.579
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 623 7 0 7 0 20
2KX8_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 846 0 0 0 0 3
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.77 0.86 30 6070 9 0 5 4 9
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.15 0.12 0.21 3 1939 11 4 7 0 23
2WW9_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 556 5 0 5 0 14
2ZZM_B 0.23 0.22 0.26 7 3459 20 2 18 0 25
2ZZN_D 0.48 0.44 0.52 12 2462 11 1 10 0 15
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.39 0.36 0.43 10 2678 13 2 11 0 18
3AM1_B - 0.91 0.83 1.00 29 3211 0 0 0 0 6
3G4S_9 0.28 0.23 0.35 13 7344 24 1 23 0 44
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3IVN_B 0.76 0.58 1.00 18 2328 0 0 0 0 13
3IWN_A 0.63 0.58 0.70 19 4251 9 0 8 1 14
3IYQ_A 0.33 0.36 0.30 34 60614 82 17 61 4 60
3IZ4_A 0.51 0.47 0.56 62 70766 49 8 40 1 70
3IZF_C 0.70 0.61 0.80 33 6862 8 1 7 0 21
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1213 12 0 12 0 17
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2829 21 0 21 0 32
3JYX_3 0.63 0.63 0.63 17 6301 21 1 9 11 10
3JYX_4 0.19 0.21 0.17 7 12204 38 11 24 3 26
3KTW_C - 0.75 0.65 0.88 28 4528 5 2 2 1 15
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.77 0.69 0.86 42 9131 8 0 7 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.57 0.50 0.65 13 1996 7 0 7 0 13
3NPB_A 0.75 0.65 0.86 30 6986 7 1 4 2 16
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 34 2 21 11 23
3O58_2 0.72 0.74 0.70 28 7220 13 4 8 1 10
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.13 5 11742 43 5 29 9 28
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.