CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RNAwolf
MCC 0.516 > 0.449
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.498 ± 0.317 > 0.414 ± 0.281
Sensitivity 0.467 > 0.417
Positive Predictive Value 0.578 > 0.491
Total TP 93 > 83
Total TN 27136 > 27128
Total FP 84 < 99
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 11
Total FP INCONS 61 < 75
Total FP COMP 16 > 13
Total FN 106 < 116
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 93
Total TN 27136
Total FP 84
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 61
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 106
Total Scores
MCC 0.516
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.498 ± 0.317
Sensitivity 0.467
Positive Predictive Value 0.578
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1210 15 1 14 0 17
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 83
Total TN 27128
Total FP 99
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 116
Total Scores
MCC 0.449
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.414 ± 0.281
Sensitivity 0.417
Positive Predictive Value 0.491
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.74 0.88 29 6072 8 0 4 4 10
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3U4M_B - 0.44 0.38 0.52 14 3133 13 0 13 0 23
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.