CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.501 > 0.244
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.550 ± 0.118 > 0.205 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.467 > 0.114
Positive Predictive Value 0.541 > 0.527
Total TP 402 > 98
Total TN 226878 < 227435
Total FP 405 > 91
Total FP CONTRA 63 > 8
Total FP INCONS 278 > 80
Total FP COMP 64 > 3
Total FN 458 < 762
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 402
Total TN 226878
Total FP 405
Total FP CONTRA 63
Total FP INCONS 278
Total FP COMP 64
Total FN 458
Total Scores
MCC 0.501
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.550 ± 0.118
Sensitivity 0.467
Positive Predictive Value 0.541
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.25 6 3462 18 0 18 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.80 0.74 0.87 20 2462 3 0 3 0 7
3A2K_C 0.41 0.39 0.44 11 2901 14 2 12 0 17
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3AKZ_H 0.16 0.14 0.19 4 2680 17 2 15 0 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60616 82 23 55 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2827 23 1 22 0 32
3JYX_3 0.54 0.56 0.54 15 6300 24 1 12 11 12
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 98
Total TN 227435
Total FP 91
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 80
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 762
Total Scores
MCC 0.244
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.205 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.114
Positive Predictive Value 0.527
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 398 0 0 0 0 3
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 860 1 0 1 0 18
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
2WRQ_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2848 3 1 1 1 17
2ZZM_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3482 4 0 4 0 32
2ZZN_D 0.43 0.19 1.00 5 2480 0 0 0 0 22
3A2K_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2924 2 0 2 0 28
3A3A_A 0.48 0.30 0.79 11 3641 3 0 3 0 26
3AKZ_H 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2699 2 0 2 0 28
3IVN_B 0.69 0.52 0.94 16 2329 1 0 1 0 15
3IYQ_A 0.14 0.07 0.28 7 60701 19 5 13 1 87
3IZ4_A 0.21 0.08 0.59 10 70859 7 0 7 0 122
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6898 5 0 5 0 54
3JYV_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2846 4 0 4 0 32
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6323 5 1 4 0 27
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12241 5 0 5 0 33
3LA5_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2468 0 0 0 0 17
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7017 4 0 4 0 46
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7257 3 0 3 0 38
3O58_3 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12398 2 0 2 0 32
3RKF_A 0.71 0.53 0.95 18 2192 1 0 1 0 16
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11777 5 1 3 1 33
4ENB_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1270 2 0 2 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.