CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.600 > 0.570
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.596 ± 0.160 < 0.606 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.374 < 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.965 > 0.754
Total TP 82 < 95
Total TN 45224 > 45183
Total FP 6 < 46
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 4
Total FP INCONS 3 < 27
Total FP COMP 3 < 15
Total FN 137 > 124
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 82
Total TN 45224
Total FP 6
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 3
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 137
Total Scores
MCC 0.600
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.596 ± 0.160
Sensitivity 0.374
Positive Predictive Value 0.965
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 400 0 0 0 0 5
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 12239 2 0 0 2 26
3O58_3 0.51 0.26 1.00 9 12394 0 0 0 0 26
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
4A1C_2 0.33 0.15 0.71 5 11774 3 0 2 1 28

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 95
Total TN 45183
Total FP 46
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 27
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 124
Total Scores
MCC 0.570
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.606 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.754
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.