CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.607 > 0.232
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.581 ± 0.094 > 0.195 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.405 > 0.097
Positive Predictive Value 0.915 > 0.563
Total TP 375 > 90
Total TN 191614 < 191864
Total FP 56 < 72
Total FP CONTRA 7 > 4
Total FP INCONS 28 < 66
Total FP COMP 21 > 2
Total FN 552 < 837
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 375
Total TN 191614
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 552
Total Scores
MCC 0.607
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.581 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.405
Positive Predictive Value 0.915
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 400 0 0 0 0 5
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2XQD_Y 0.79 0.63 1.00 17 2833 0 0 0 0 10
3A2K_C 0.78 0.61 1.00 17 2909 0 0 0 0 11
3AMU_B 0.69 0.59 0.80 16 2983 6 0 4 2 11
3GX2_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 13 4358 0 0 0 0 27
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.47 0.23 0.94 31 70843 2 0 2 0 101
3IZF_C 0.73 0.56 0.97 30 6872 1 0 1 0 24
3JYV_7 0.68 0.50 0.94 16 2833 1 0 1 0 16
3JYX_4 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 12239 2 0 0 2 26
3JYX_3 0.64 0.56 0.75 15 6308 10 1 4 5 12
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 9 7012 2 0 0 2 37
3O58_2 0.83 0.71 0.96 27 7232 2 0 1 1 11
3O58_3 0.51 0.26 1.00 9 12394 0 0 0 0 26
3PDR_A 0.62 0.40 0.97 29 12850 3 0 1 2 43
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4A1C_2 0.33 0.15 0.71 5 11774 3 0 2 1 28
4AOB_A 0.49 0.33 0.74 14 4352 6 1 4 1 28
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 90
Total TN 191864
Total FP 72
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 66
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 837
Total Scores
MCC 0.232
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.195 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.097
Positive Predictive Value 0.563
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 398 0 0 0 0 3
2WRQ_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2848 3 1 1 1 17
2XQD_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2845 5 0 5 0 27
3A2K_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2924 2 0 2 0 28
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3001 2 0 2 0 27
3GX2_A 0.36 0.15 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 34
3IVN_B 0.69 0.52 0.94 16 2329 1 0 1 0 15
3IZ4_A 0.21 0.08 0.59 10 70859 7 0 7 0 122
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6898 5 0 5 0 54
3JYV_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2846 4 0 4 0 32
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12241 5 0 5 0 33
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6323 5 1 4 0 27
3LA5_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2468 0 0 0 0 17
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7017 4 0 4 0 46
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7257 3 0 3 0 38
3O58_3 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12398 2 0 2 0 32
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12872 8 0 8 0 72
3RKF_A 0.71 0.53 0.95 18 2192 1 0 1 0 16
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7136 4 1 3 0 54
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11777 5 1 3 1 33
4AOB_A 0.35 0.14 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 36
4ENB_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1270 2 0 2 0 16
4ENC_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1321 2 0 2 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.