CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Cylofold
MCC 0.740 > 0.661
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.731 ± 0.067 > 0.682 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.584 > 0.553
Positive Predictive Value 0.941 > 0.796
Total TP 239 > 226
Total TN 58144 > 58114
Total FP 22 < 73
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 11
Total FP INCONS 13 < 47
Total FP COMP 7 < 15
Total FN 170 < 183
P-value 1.87872347734e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 239
Total TN 58144
Total FP 22
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 170
Total Scores
MCC 0.740
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.731 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.584
Positive Predictive Value 0.941
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3IZF_C 0.75 0.61 0.92 33 6867 4 0 3 1 21
3O58_2 0.78 0.76 0.81 29 7224 9 2 5 2 9
3O58_3 0.54 0.31 0.92 11 12391 1 0 1 0 24
3PDR_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 45 12832 5 0 3 2 27
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 226
Total TN 58114
Total FP 73
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 47
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 183
Total Scores
MCC 0.661
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.553
Positive Predictive Value 0.796
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2XQD_Y 0.81 0.78 0.84 21 2825 4 4 0 0 6
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3IZF_C 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 6867 6 0 6 0 24
3O58_2 0.80 0.68 0.93 26 7232 3 0 2 1 12
3O58_3 0.36 0.34 0.38 12 12371 29 5 15 9 23
3PDR_A 0.72 0.54 0.95 39 12839 4 0 2 2 33
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.