CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & PPfold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) PPfold(20)
MCC 0.691 > 0.665
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.669 ± 0.151 > 0.640 ± 0.167
Sensitivity 0.515 < 0.519
Positive Predictive Value 0.933 > 0.859
Total TP 139 < 140
Total TN 34874 > 34860
Total FP 15 < 29
Total FP CONTRA 1 > 0
Total FP INCONS 9 < 23
Total FP COMP 5 < 6
Total FN 131 > 130
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and PPfold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and PPfold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and PPfold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and PPfold(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 139
Total TN 34874
Total FP 15
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 9
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 131
Total Scores
MCC 0.691
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.669 ± 0.151
Sensitivity 0.515
Positive Predictive Value 0.933
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.26 0.15 0.45 5 11770 8 1 5 2 28
4A1C_3 0.76 0.63 0.92 34 7103 4 0 3 1 20
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of PPfold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 34860
Total FP 29
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 130
Total Scores
MCC 0.665
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.167
Sensitivity 0.519
Positive Predictive Value 0.859
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3RKF_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 19 2191 1 0 1 0 15
3SD1_A 0.68 0.52 0.88 22 3891 3 0 3 0 20
4A1C_2 0.21 0.15 0.29 5 11764 16 0 12 4 28
4A1C_3 0.77 0.63 0.94 34 7104 2 0 2 0 20
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.56 0.37 0.88 7 1267 1 0 1 0 12
4ENC_A 0.58 0.42 0.80 8 1316 2 0 2 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.