CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) RDfolder
MCC 0.761 > 0.525
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.058 > 0.524 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.607 > 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.960 > 0.678
Total TP 238 > 162
Total TN 36532 < 36541
Total FP 16 < 85
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 9
Total FP INCONS 4 < 68
Total FP COMP 6 < 8
Total FN 154 < 230
P-value 1.91441904741e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 238
Total TN 36532
Total FP 16
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 4
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 154
Total Scores
MCC 0.761
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.058
Sensitivity 0.607
Positive Predictive Value 0.960
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 11 5 3 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3GX2_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 16
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 1 0 0 11
3JYV_7 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 11
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 162
Total TN 36541
Total FP 85
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 68
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 230
Total Scores
MCC 0.525
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.524 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.678
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3GX2_A 0.50 0.40 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2830 20 0 20 0 32
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.