CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) Fold
MCC 0.583 > 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.526 ± 0.091 < 0.579 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.369 < 0.504
Positive Predictive Value 0.922 > 0.627
Total TP 343 < 468
Total TN 229943 > 229568
Total FP 41 < 321
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 47
Total FP INCONS 16 < 232
Total FP COMP 12 < 42
Total FN 586 > 461
P-value 3.05835476236e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 343
Total TN 229943
Total FP 41
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 586
Total Scores
MCC 0.583
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.526 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.369
Positive Predictive Value 0.922
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 861 0 0 0 0 18
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1540 0 0 0 0 20
2WWQ_V 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2920 0 0 0 0 22
2XQD_Y 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2844 0 0 0 0 21
3AKZ_H 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2695 0 0 0 0 22
3AMU_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2997 0 0 0 0 21
3IYQ_A 0.52 0.39 0.70 37 60673 21 10 6 5 57
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.39 0.88 51 70818 7 2 5 0 81
3IZF_C 0.54 0.30 1.00 16 6887 0 0 0 0 38
3J16_L 0.45 0.20 1.00 6 2769 0 0 0 0 24
3NPB_A 0.71 0.54 0.93 25 6994 4 1 1 2 21
3O58_3 0.56 0.34 0.92 12 12390 1 0 1 0 23
3O58_2 0.65 0.42 1.00 16 7244 0 0 0 0 22
3PDR_A 0.77 0.61 0.98 44 12835 3 0 1 2 28
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
3UZL_B 0.40 0.16 1.00 6 3564 0 0 0 0 31
4A1C_2 0.46 0.24 0.89 8 11772 3 0 1 2 25
4A1C_3 0.54 0.30 1.00 16 7124 0 0 0 0 38
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1267 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1318 0 0 0 0 11

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 468
Total TN 229568
Total FP 321
Total FP CONTRA 47
Total FP INCONS 232
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 461
Total Scores
MCC 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.579 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.504
Positive Predictive Value 0.627
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.64 0.90 18 2906 3 0 2 1 10
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.84 0.75 0.95 21 2679 1 1 0 0 7
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3IYQ_A 0.29 0.31 0.27 29 60618 83 20 59 4 65
3IZ4_A 0.53 0.46 0.61 61 70776 44 5 34 5 71
3IZF_C 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 6864 7 1 6 0 22
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 0 5 0 14
3NPB_A 0.70 0.61 0.80 28 6986 10 1 6 3 18
3O58_3 0.29 0.31 0.28 11 12363 41 3 26 12 24
3O58_2 0.71 0.71 0.71 27 7222 12 3 8 1 11
3PDR_A 0.77 0.64 0.94 46 12831 5 0 3 2 26
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3UZL_B 0.77 0.62 0.96 23 3546 1 0 1 0 14
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11744 43 5 27 11 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.57 0.82 31 7102 7 1 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1263 7 1 6 0 14
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.