CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) MCFold
MCC 0.603 > 0.442
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.537 ± 0.084 > 0.438 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.377 < 0.466
Positive Predictive Value 0.971 > 0.427
Total TP 333 < 412
Total TN 125950 > 125329
Total FP 22 < 602
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 82
Total FP INCONS 9 < 470
Total FP COMP 12 < 50
Total FN 551 > 472
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 333
Total TN 125950
Total FP 22
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 9
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 551
Total Scores
MCC 0.603
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.537 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.377
Positive Predictive Value 0.971
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 861 0 0 0 0 18
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1540 0 0 0 0 20
2WRQ_Y 0.24 0.12 0.50 2 2846 4 0 2 2 15
2WWQ_V 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2920 0 0 0 0 22
2XQD_Y 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2844 0 0 0 0 21
2ZZN_D 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2479 0 0 0 0 21
3A2K_C 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2920 0 0 0 0 22
3A3A_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 27 3628 0 0 0 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2695 0 0 0 0 22
3AMU_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2997 0 0 0 0 21
3GX2_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 16
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 1 0 0 11
3IZF_C 0.54 0.30 1.00 16 6887 0 0 0 0 38
3J16_L 0.45 0.20 1.00 6 2769 0 0 0 0 24
3JYV_7 0.43 0.19 1.00 6 2844 0 0 0 0 26
3JYX_4 0.52 0.30 0.91 10 12235 3 0 1 2 23
3JYX_3 0.59 0.41 0.85 11 6315 5 0 2 3 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3O58_2 0.65 0.42 1.00 16 7244 0 0 0 0 22
3O58_3 0.56 0.34 0.92 12 12390 1 0 1 0 23
3PDR_A 0.77 0.61 0.98 44 12835 3 0 1 2 28
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.46 0.24 0.89 8 11772 3 0 1 2 25
4A1C_3 0.54 0.30 1.00 16 7124 0 0 0 0 38
4ENB_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1267 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1318 0 0 0 0 11

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 412
Total TN 125329
Total FP 602
Total FP CONTRA 82
Total FP INCONS 470
Total FP COMP 50
Total FN 472
Total Scores
MCC 0.442
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.438 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.466
Positive Predictive Value 0.427
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.91 0.89 0.94 16 844 2 0 1 1 2
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
2WRQ_Y 0.27 0.35 0.22 6 2823 25 8 13 4 11
2WWQ_V 0.15 0.18 0.15 5 2892 30 4 25 1 23
2XQD_Y 0.34 0.37 0.32 10 2819 22 1 20 1 17
2ZZN_D 0.61 0.63 0.61 17 2457 13 1 10 2 10
3A2K_C 0.44 0.46 0.42 13 2895 18 2 16 0 15
3A3A_A 0.89 0.86 0.91 32 3620 3 1 2 0 5
3AKZ_H 0.40 0.43 0.39 12 2670 19 3 16 0 16
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3GX2_A 0.47 0.48 0.48 19 4331 22 0 21 1 21
3IVN_B 0.39 0.39 0.40 12 2316 18 0 18 0 19
3IZF_C 0.71 0.69 0.74 37 6853 14 0 13 1 17
3J16_L 0.45 0.47 0.44 14 2743 19 1 17 1 16
3JYV_7 0.21 0.22 0.21 7 2817 26 0 26 0 25
3JYX_4 0.20 0.24 0.17 8 12199 43 16 23 4 25
3JYX_3 0.41 0.52 0.33 14 6285 34 12 17 5 13
3LA5_A 0.32 0.32 0.34 11 2453 21 1 20 0 23
3O58_2 0.20 0.24 0.17 9 7208 44 5 38 1 29
3O58_3 0.22 0.26 0.19 9 12355 45 9 30 6 26
3PDR_A 0.66 0.61 0.72 44 12819 19 0 17 2 28
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.