CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) RNASLOpt
MCC 0.542 > 0.474
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.487 ± 0.193 < 0.505 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.299 < 0.374
Positive Predictive Value 0.987 > 0.609
Total TP 76 < 95
Total TN 33701 > 33622
Total FP 4 < 67
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 11
Total FP INCONS 1 < 50
Total FP COMP 3 < 6
Total FN 178 > 159
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASLOpt).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 76
Total TN 33701
Total FP 4
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 1
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 178
Total Scores
MCC 0.542
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.487 ± 0.193
Sensitivity 0.299
Positive Predictive Value 0.987
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1540 0 0 0 0 20
3J16_L 0.45 0.20 1.00 6 2769 0 0 0 0 24
3UZL_B 0.40 0.16 1.00 6 3564 0 0 0 0 31
4A1C_3 0.54 0.30 1.00 16 7124 0 0 0 0 38
4A1C_2 0.46 0.24 0.89 8 11772 3 0 1 2 25
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1267 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1318 0 0 0 0 11

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 95
Total TN 33622
Total FP 67
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 50
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 159
Total Scores
MCC 0.474
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.505 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.374
Positive Predictive Value 0.609
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
3J16_L 0.53 0.40 0.71 12 2758 5 0 5 0 18
3UZL_B 0.48 0.32 0.71 12 3553 5 0 5 0 25
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.