CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.526 > 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.531 ± 0.221 > 0.497 ± 0.225
Sensitivity 0.438 > 0.389
Positive Predictive Value 0.637 < 0.715
Total TP 116 > 103
Total TN 49916 < 49954
Total FP 75 > 56
Total FP CONTRA 12 > 4
Total FP INCONS 54 > 37
Total FP COMP 9 < 15
Total FN 149 < 162
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 116
Total TN 49916
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 149
Total Scores
MCC 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.531 ± 0.221
Sensitivity 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.637
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.23 0.21 0.25 7 12218 25 5 16 4 26
3O58_3 0.38 0.29 0.50 10 12383 10 0 10 0 25
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 103
Total TN 49954
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 162
Total Scores
MCC 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.497 ± 0.225
Sensitivity 0.389
Positive Predictive Value 0.715
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3A3A_A 0.70 0.49 1.00 18 3637 0 0 0 0 19
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.