CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & RNAshapes [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold RNAshapes
MCC 0.596 > 0.545
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.571 ± 0.071 > 0.534 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.507 > 0.480
Positive Predictive Value 0.705 > 0.622
Total TP 892 > 844
Total TN 329432 > 329341
Total FP 419 < 595
Total FP CONTRA 64 < 74
Total FP INCONS 309 < 438
Total FP COMP 46 < 83
Total FN 866 < 914
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and RNAshapes. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNAshapes).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNAshapes).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and RNAshapes. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNAshapes).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 892
Total TN 329432
Total FP 419
Total FP CONTRA 64
Total FP INCONS 309
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 866
Total Scores
MCC 0.596
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.571 ± 0.071
Sensitivity 0.507
Positive Predictive Value 0.705
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.42 0.26 0.71 5 623 2 0 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.82 0.74 0.91 29 6073 4 0 3 1 10
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 561 0 0 0 0 14
2WW9_D - 0.29 0.12 0.75 3 1949 1 0 1 0 23
2WWQ_V 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2906 3 0 1 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.75 0.67 0.86 18 2829 3 0 3 0 9
2ZZM_B 0.18 0.16 0.23 5 3464 17 3 14 0 27
2ZZN_D 0.82 0.78 0.88 21 2461 3 0 3 0 6
3A2K_C 0.44 0.43 0.46 12 2900 14 2 12 0 16
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.43 0.39 0.48 11 2678 12 2 10 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.68 0.63 0.73 22 3210 8 1 7 0 13
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3GX2_A 0.79 0.63 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.80 0.67 0.96 22 4255 1 0 1 0 11
3IYQ_A 0.36 0.37 0.34 35 60624 71 17 50 4 59
3IZ4_A 0.55 0.45 0.68 59 70789 33 4 24 5 73
3IZF_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 33 6860 10 1 9 0 21
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 24 0 21 3 25
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.31 0.56 5 1119 4 2 2 0 11
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3JYV_7 0.77 0.59 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 13
3JYX_4 0.23 0.21 0.25 7 12218 25 5 16 4 26
3JYX_3 0.29 0.30 0.30 8 6301 20 8 11 1 19
3KTW_C - 0.45 0.40 0.53 17 4528 16 2 13 1 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.80 0.70 0.91 43 9133 5 0 4 1 18
3NKB_B - 0.57 0.50 0.65 13 1996 7 0 7 0 13
3NPB_A 0.77 0.70 0.86 32 6984 7 1 4 2 14
3O58_2 0.82 0.76 0.88 29 7227 7 1 3 3 9
3O58_3 0.38 0.29 0.50 10 12383 10 0 10 0 25
3PDR_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 43 12832 7 0 5 2 29
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.57 0.46 0.71 17 3136 7 0 7 0 20
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8

^top



Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 844
Total TN 329341
Total FP 595
Total FP CONTRA 74
Total FP INCONS 438
Total FP COMP 83
Total FN 914
Total Scores
MCC 0.545
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.534 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.480
Positive Predictive Value 0.622
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 846 0 0 0 0 3
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 1 0 0 1 5
2WRQ_Y 0.59 0.59 0.59 10 2833 12 4 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_E - 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 557 0 0 0 0 10
2WW9_D - 0.16 0.12 0.25 3 1941 9 4 5 0 23
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.68 0.86 19 2904 5 0 3 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.64 0.56 0.75 15 2830 5 0 5 0 12
2ZZM_B 0.10 0.09 0.12 3 3460 23 0 23 0 29
2ZZN_D 0.69 0.63 0.77 17 2463 5 1 4 0 10
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3A3A_A 0.76 0.65 0.89 24 3628 3 0 3 0 13
3ADB_C - 0.67 0.61 0.74 23 4155 8 0 8 0 15
3AKZ_H 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2679 6 1 4 1 11
3AM1_B - 0.64 0.60 0.70 21 3210 9 1 8 0 14
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3GX2_A 0.76 0.63 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.76 0.67 0.88 22 4253 3 0 3 0 11
3IYQ_A 0.26 0.28 0.24 26 60619 83 21 60 2 68
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.45 0.60 60 70776 45 6 34 5 72
3IZF_C 0.59 0.52 0.68 28 6862 13 1 12 0 26
3J0L_2 - 0.38 0.36 0.40 12 6186 20 3 15 2 21
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1213 12 0 12 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.23 0.19 0.30 3 1118 7 1 6 0 13
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2830 20 0 20 0 32
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3JYX_3 0.63 0.63 0.63 17 6301 21 1 9 11 10
3KTW_C - 0.39 0.35 0.45 15 4527 19 1 17 1 28
3LA5_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 14
3NDB_M - 0.82 0.72 0.94 44 9133 4 0 3 1 17
3NKB_B - 0.61 0.54 0.70 14 1996 6 0 6 0 12
3NPB_A 0.77 0.63 0.94 29 6990 4 1 1 2 17
3O58_2 0.60 0.61 0.59 23 7221 18 4 12 2 15
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3PDR_A 0.67 0.56 0.80 40 12830 12 0 10 2 32
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.39 0.32 0.48 12 3545 13 2 11 0 25
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11746 41 5 25 11 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.57 0.82 31 7102 7 1 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.