CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & RNAsubopt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold RNAsubopt
MCC 0.596 > 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.571 ± 0.071 > 0.511 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.507 > 0.486
Positive Predictive Value 0.705 > 0.605
Total TP 892 > 854
Total TN 329432 > 329286
Total FP 419 < 625
Total FP CONTRA 64 < 84
Total FP INCONS 309 < 473
Total FP COMP 46 < 68
Total FN 866 < 904
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and RNAsubopt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNAsubopt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNAsubopt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and RNAsubopt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNAsubopt).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 892
Total TN 329432
Total FP 419
Total FP CONTRA 64
Total FP INCONS 309
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 866
Total Scores
MCC 0.596
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.571 ± 0.071
Sensitivity 0.507
Positive Predictive Value 0.705
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.42 0.26 0.71 5 623 2 0 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.82 0.74 0.91 29 6073 4 0 3 1 10
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 561 0 0 0 0 14
2WW9_D - 0.29 0.12 0.75 3 1949 1 0 1 0 23
2WWQ_V 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2906 3 0 1 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.75 0.67 0.86 18 2829 3 0 3 0 9
2ZZM_B 0.18 0.16 0.23 5 3464 17 3 14 0 27
2ZZN_D 0.82 0.78 0.88 21 2461 3 0 3 0 6
3A2K_C 0.44 0.43 0.46 12 2900 14 2 12 0 16
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.43 0.39 0.48 11 2678 12 2 10 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.68 0.63 0.73 22 3210 8 1 7 0 13
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3GX2_A 0.79 0.63 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.80 0.67 0.96 22 4255 1 0 1 0 11
3IYQ_A 0.36 0.37 0.34 35 60624 71 17 50 4 59
3IZ4_A 0.55 0.45 0.68 59 70789 33 4 24 5 73
3IZF_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 33 6860 10 1 9 0 21
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 24 0 21 3 25
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.31 0.56 5 1119 4 2 2 0 11
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3JYV_7 0.77 0.59 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 13
3JYX_4 0.23 0.21 0.25 7 12218 25 5 16 4 26
3JYX_3 0.29 0.30 0.30 8 6301 20 8 11 1 19
3KTW_C - 0.45 0.40 0.53 17 4528 16 2 13 1 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.80 0.70 0.91 43 9133 5 0 4 1 18
3NKB_B - 0.57 0.50 0.65 13 1996 7 0 7 0 13
3NPB_A 0.77 0.70 0.86 32 6984 7 1 4 2 14
3O58_2 0.82 0.76 0.88 29 7227 7 1 3 3 9
3O58_3 0.38 0.29 0.50 10 12383 10 0 10 0 25
3PDR_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 43 12832 7 0 5 2 29
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.57 0.46 0.71 17 3136 7 0 7 0 20
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8

^top



Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 854
Total TN 329286
Total FP 625
Total FP CONTRA 84
Total FP INCONS 473
Total FP COMP 68
Total FN 904
Total Scores
MCC 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.511 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.486
Positive Predictive Value 0.605
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.52 0.43 0.65 17 5125 12 3 6 3 23
2KX8_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 846 0 0 0 0 3
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.77 0.86 30 6070 9 0 5 4 9
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 556 5 0 5 0 14
2WW9_D - 0.15 0.12 0.21 3 1939 11 4 7 0 23
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.68 0.86 19 2904 5 0 3 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.75 0.67 0.86 18 2829 3 0 3 0 9
2ZZM_B 0.23 0.22 0.26 7 3459 20 2 18 0 25
2ZZN_D 0.48 0.44 0.52 12 2462 11 1 10 0 15
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.39 0.36 0.43 10 2678 13 2 11 0 18
3AM1_B - 0.91 0.83 1.00 29 3211 0 0 0 0 6
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3GX2_A 0.44 0.38 0.54 15 4343 14 1 12 1 25
3IVN_B 0.76 0.58 1.00 18 2328 0 0 0 0 13
3IWN_A 0.63 0.58 0.70 19 4251 9 0 8 1 14
3IYQ_A 0.33 0.36 0.30 34 60614 82 17 61 4 60
3IZ4_A 0.51 0.47 0.56 62 70766 49 8 40 1 70
3IZF_C 0.70 0.61 0.80 33 6862 8 1 7 0 21
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 25 0 21 4 25
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 1 4 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1213 12 0 12 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.31 0.42 5 1116 7 1 6 0 11
3J16_L 0.41 0.37 0.48 11 2752 12 1 11 0 19
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2829 21 0 21 0 32
3JYX_4 0.19 0.21 0.17 7 12204 38 11 24 3 26
3JYX_3 0.63 0.63 0.63 17 6301 21 1 9 11 10
3KTW_C - 0.75 0.65 0.88 28 4528 5 2 2 1 15
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.77 0.69 0.86 42 9131 8 0 7 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.57 0.50 0.65 13 1996 7 0 7 0 13
3NPB_A 0.75 0.65 0.86 30 6986 7 1 4 2 16
3O58_2 0.72 0.74 0.70 28 7220 13 4 8 1 10
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 34 2 21 11 23
3PDR_A 0.75 0.63 0.90 45 12830 7 1 4 2 27
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.13 5 11742 43 5 29 9 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.52 0.43 0.64 18 4343 11 2 8 1 24
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 0 7 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.