CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold RNAwolf
MCC 0.551 > 0.399
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.503 ± 0.136 > 0.380 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.447 > 0.368
Positive Predictive Value 0.686 > 0.444
Total TP 225 > 185
Total TN 60879 > 60790
Total FP 115 < 253
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 28
Total FP INCONS 91 < 204
Total FP COMP 12 < 21
Total FN 278 < 318
P-value 2.08252958266e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 225
Total TN 60879
Total FP 115
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 91
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 278
Total Scores
MCC 0.551
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.503 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.447
Positive Predictive Value 0.686
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.82 0.74 0.91 29 6073 4 0 3 1 10
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.31 0.56 5 1119 4 2 2 0 11
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 24 0 21 3 25
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.57 0.46 0.71 17 3136 7 0 7 0 20
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 185
Total TN 60790
Total FP 253
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 204
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 318
Total Scores
MCC 0.399
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.380 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.368
Positive Predictive Value 0.444
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.74 0.88 29 6072 8 0 4 4 10
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J0L_g - 0.16 0.25 0.11 1 456 8 6 2 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.19 0.20 3 1113 12 1 11 0 13
3J0L_2 - 0.11 0.12 0.11 4 6181 34 5 26 3 29
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3U4M_B - 0.44 0.38 0.52 14 3133 13 0 13 0 23
3UZL_B 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 3545 4 1 2 1 15
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.