CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.555 > 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.172 > 0.510 ± 0.236
Sensitivity 0.449 > 0.422
Positive Predictive Value 0.694 > 0.642
Total TP 118 > 111
Total TN 33390 > 33387
Total FP 58 < 72
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 8
Total FP INCONS 42 < 54
Total FP COMP 6 < 10
Total FN 145 < 152
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 118
Total TN 33390
Total FP 58
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 42
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 145
Total Scores
MCC 0.555
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.449
Positive Predictive Value 0.694
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 111
Total TN 33387
Total FP 72
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 152
Total Scores
MCC 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.236
Sensitivity 0.422
Positive Predictive Value 0.642
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.