CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST Mastr(20)
MCC 0.631 > 0.567
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.655 ± 0.173 > 0.510 ± 0.210
Sensitivity 0.496 > 0.389
Positive Predictive Value 0.807 < 0.833
Total TP 134 > 105
Total TN 34857 < 34897
Total FP 41 > 24
Total FP CONTRA 5 > 1
Total FP INCONS 27 > 20
Total FP COMP 9 > 3
Total FN 136 < 165
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Mastr(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 134
Total TN 34857
Total FP 41
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 27
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 136
Total Scores
MCC 0.631
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.655 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.496
Positive Predictive Value 0.807
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 105
Total TN 34897
Total FP 24
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 20
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 165
Total Scores
MCC 0.567
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.210
Sensitivity 0.389
Positive Predictive Value 0.833
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.77 0.59 1.00 16 2987 1 0 0 1 11
3RKF_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2194 0 0 0 0 17
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 7 0 6 1 22
4AOB_A 0.39 0.26 0.58 11 4352 9 0 8 1 31
4ENB_A 0.39 0.16 1.00 3 1272 0 0 0 0 16
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.