CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RDfolder
MCC 0.618 > 0.310
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.516 ± 0.208 > 0.258 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.443 > 0.221
Positive Predictive Value 0.871 > 0.451
Total TP 128 > 64
Total TN 23718 < 23723
Total FP 22 < 81
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 7
Total FP INCONS 19 < 71
Total FP COMP 3 = 3
Total FN 161 < 225
P-value 8.61680779366e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 23718
Total FP 22
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 161
Total Scores
MCC 0.618
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.516 ± 0.208
Sensitivity 0.443
Positive Predictive Value 0.871
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J0L_7 - 0.60 0.41 0.88 7 1217 1 0 1 0 10
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 3 0 3 0 16
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 64
Total TN 23723
Total FP 81
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 225
Total Scores
MCC 0.310
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.258 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.221
Positive Predictive Value 0.451
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 4 1 3 0 16
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.