CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RNAwolf
MCC 0.558 > 0.399
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.492 ± 0.164 > 0.380 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.402 > 0.368
Positive Predictive Value 0.783 > 0.444
Total TP 202 > 185
Total TN 60949 > 60790
Total FP 65 < 253
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 28
Total FP INCONS 51 < 204
Total FP COMP 9 < 21
Total FN 301 < 318
P-value 1.87872347734e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 202
Total TN 60949
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 301
Total Scores
MCC 0.558
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.492 ± 0.164
Sensitivity 0.402
Positive Predictive Value 0.783
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6101 4 0 4 0 39
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 3 0 3 0 16
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.24 1.00 8 6208 0 0 0 0 25
3J0L_7 - 0.60 0.41 0.88 7 1217 1 0 1 0 10
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.43 0.80 16 3140 4 0 4 0 21
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 185
Total TN 60790
Total FP 253
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 204
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 318
Total Scores
MCC 0.399
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.380 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.368
Positive Predictive Value 0.444
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.74 0.88 29 6072 8 0 4 4 10
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J0L_g - 0.16 0.25 0.11 1 456 8 6 2 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.19 0.20 3 1113 12 1 11 0 13
3J0L_2 - 0.11 0.12 0.11 4 6181 34 5 26 3 29
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3U4M_B - 0.44 0.38 0.52 14 3133 13 0 13 0 23
3UZL_B 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 3545 4 1 2 1 15
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.