CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & MXScarna(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold MXScarna(seed)
MCC 0.616 > 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.156 > 0.516 ± 0.223
Sensitivity 0.476 > 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.801 > 0.758
Total TP 121 > 116
Total TN 33627 > 33625
Total FP 44 < 52
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 4
Total FP INCONS 28 < 33
Total FP COMP 14 < 15
Total FN 133 < 138
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 121
Total TN 33627
Total FP 44
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 133
Total Scores
MCC 0.616
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.476
Positive Predictive Value 0.801
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 116
Total TN 33625
Total FP 52
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 138
Total Scores
MCC 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.516 ± 0.223
Sensitivity 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.758
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 12 0 10 2 20
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3UZL_B 0.66 0.49 0.90 18 3550 2 1 1 0 19
4A1C_3 0.75 0.65 0.88 35 7100 5 1 4 0 19
4A1C_2 0.35 0.24 0.50 8 11765 20 1 7 12 25
4AOB_A 0.66 0.55 0.79 23 4342 7 0 6 1 19
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 1 3 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.