CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Pknots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Pknots
MCC 0.601 > 0.408
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.543 ± 0.159 > 0.423 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.483 > 0.373
Positive Predictive Value 0.754 > 0.456
Total TP 193 > 149
Total TN 51821 > 51750
Total FP 81 < 194
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 18
Total FP INCONS 58 < 160
Total FP COMP 18 > 16
Total FN 207 < 251
P-value 2.26346675981e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Pknots).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Pknots).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 193
Total TN 51821
Total FP 81
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 58
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 207
Total Scores
MCC 0.601
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.543 ± 0.159
Sensitivity 0.483
Positive Predictive Value 0.754
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
2LKR_A - 0.65 0.56 0.76 22 6076 9 0 7 2 17
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_2 - 0.64 0.61 0.69 20 6187 11 2 7 2 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 1118 1 0 1 0 7
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3U4M_B - 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 3139 0 0 0 0 16
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 149
Total TN 51750
Total FP 194
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 160
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 251
Total Scores
MCC 0.408
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.423 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.373
Positive Predictive Value 0.456
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 1522 3 1 2 0 5
2LKR_A - 0.44 0.44 0.45 17 6067 22 4 17 1 22
3J0L_7 - 0.28 0.29 0.29 5 1208 12 0 12 0 12
3J0L_2 - 0.36 0.36 0.36 12 6183 23 3 18 2 21
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 2 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.31 0.42 5 1116 7 1 6 0 11
3J16_L 0.34 0.30 0.41 9 2753 13 0 13 0 21
3U4M_B - 0.26 0.22 0.32 8 3135 17 0 17 0 29
3UZL_B 0.75 0.59 0.96 22 3547 1 0 1 0 15
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.25 8 11749 36 3 21 12 25
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4AOB_A 0.17 0.14 0.21 6 4343 23 1 21 1 36
4ENB_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 15 1258 2 1 1 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.