CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold RDfolder
MCC 0.537 > 0.229
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.481 ± 0.261 > 0.175 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.425 > 0.168
Positive Predictive Value 0.689 > 0.329
Total TP 71 > 28
Total TN 14002 < 14020
Total FP 33 < 58
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 5
Total FP INCONS 29 < 52
Total FP COMP 1 = 1
Total FN 96 < 139
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 71
Total TN 14002
Total FP 33
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 96
Total Scores
MCC 0.537
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.481 ± 0.261
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
3J0L_a - 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 1118 1 0 1 0 7
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 28
Total TN 14020
Total FP 58
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 52
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 139
Total Scores
MCC 0.229
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.175 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.168
Positive Predictive Value 0.329
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 4 1 3 0 16
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.