CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & Sfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold Sfold
MCC 0.526 > 0.464
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.553 ± 0.065 > 0.549 ± 0.064
Sensitivity 0.462 > 0.387
Positive Predictive Value 0.599 > 0.557
Total TP 2411 > 2020
Total TN 13351182 < 13351579
Total FP 1778 > 1754
Total FP CONTRA 299 > 245
Total FP INCONS 1315 < 1363
Total FP COMP 164 > 146
Total FN 2802 < 3193
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and Sfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Sfold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Sfold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and Sfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Sfold).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2411
Total TN 13351182
Total FP 1778
Total FP CONTRA 299
Total FP INCONS 1315
Total FP COMP 164
Total FN 2802
Total Scores
MCC 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.553 ± 0.065
Sensitivity 0.462
Positive Predictive Value 0.599
Nr of predictions 58

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - 0.45 0.25 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 15
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 2 3 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.79 0.89 31 6070 6 0 4 2 8
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WDL_A - 0.57 0.48 0.67 582 3937349 294 33 257 4 622
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 561 0 0 0 0 14
2WW9_D - 0.39 0.23 0.67 6 1944 3 2 1 0 20
2WWQ_V 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 2905 4 0 2 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.78 0.70 0.86 19 2828 3 0 3 0 8
2ZZM_B 0.53 0.47 0.60 15 3461 10 2 8 0 17
2ZZN_D 0.82 0.78 0.88 21 2461 3 0 3 0 6
3A2K_C 0.44 0.43 0.46 12 2900 14 2 12 0 16
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.39 0.39 0.41 11 2674 17 4 12 1 17
3AM1_B - 0.68 0.63 0.73 22 3210 8 1 7 0 13
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3G4S_9 0.30 0.25 0.38 14 7344 23 1 22 0 43
3GCA_A - 0.49 0.29 0.83 5 522 1 0 1 0 12
3GX2_A 0.77 0.63 0.96 25 4345 2 0 1 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.80 0.67 0.96 22 4255 1 0 1 0 11
3IYQ_A 0.34 0.37 0.32 35 60615 80 21 55 4 59
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 60 70777 44 4 35 5 72
3IZF_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 33 6860 10 1 9 0 21
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 464 1 1 0 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 26 0 21 5 25
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.50 0.44 0.58 7 1116 5 2 3 0 9
3J16_L 0.46 0.40 0.55 12 2753 10 1 9 0 18
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2830 20 0 20 0 32
3JYX_3 0.28 0.30 0.27 8 6298 23 8 14 1 19
3JYX_4 0.20 0.21 0.20 7 12211 35 6 22 7 26
3JYX_5 - 0.36 0.35 0.37 311 5022016 626 153 385 88 582
3KIY_A - 0.56 0.47 0.67 585 4053253 305 29 261 15 656
3KTW_C - 0.44 0.40 0.50 17 4526 18 2 15 1 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.81 0.72 0.92 44 9132 5 0 4 1 17
3NKB_B - 0.54 0.50 0.59 13 1994 9 0 9 0 13
3NPB_A 0.76 0.70 0.84 32 6983 8 1 5 2 14
3O58_3 0.28 0.26 0.31 9 12374 20 3 17 0 26
3O58_2 0.78 0.76 0.81 29 7224 10 2 5 3 9
3PDR_A 0.69 0.60 0.80 43 12826 13 0 11 2 29
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 2 7 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.46 0.77 17 3138 5 0 5 0 20
3UZL_B 0.70 0.54 0.91 20 3548 2 0 2 0 17
4A1C_3 0.66 0.57 0.78 31 7100 9 1 8 0 23
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 33 5 20 8 28
4AOB_A 0.44 0.36 0.56 15 4344 13 1 11 1 27
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8

^top



Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2020
Total TN 13351579
Total FP 1754
Total FP CONTRA 245
Total FP INCONS 1363
Total FP COMP 146
Total FN 3193
Total Scores
MCC 0.464
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.549 ± 0.064
Sensitivity 0.387
Positive Predictive Value 0.557
Nr of predictions 58

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 623 7 0 7 0 20
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 0 5 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.89 0.79 1.00 31 6074 1 0 0 1 8
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WDL_A - 0.41 0.34 0.50 410 3937401 411 25 385 1 794
2WRQ_Y 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 2833 13 5 3 5 8
2WW9_F - 0.69 0.70 0.70 7 290 3 0 3 0 3
2WW9_E - 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 557 0 0 0 0 10
2WW9_D - 0.29 0.12 0.75 3 1949 1 0 1 0 23
2WWQ_V 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2906 2 0 1 1 9
2XQD_Y 0.77 0.67 0.90 18 2830 2 0 2 0 9
2ZZM_B 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 3468 15 0 15 0 29
2ZZN_D 0.82 0.78 0.88 21 2461 3 0 3 0 6
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.62 0.55 0.70 21 4156 9 0 9 0 17
3AKZ_H 0.44 0.39 0.50 11 2679 11 2 9 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.69 0.63 0.76 22 3211 7 1 6 0 13
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3G4S_9 0.51 0.39 0.69 22 7349 10 1 9 0 35
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3GX2_A 0.72 0.55 0.96 22 4348 2 0 1 1 18
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.63 0.58 0.70 19 4251 9 0 8 1 14
3IYQ_A 0.33 0.34 0.32 32 60627 71 19 48 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.42 0.65 56 70790 31 3 27 1 76
3IZF_C 0.71 0.61 0.83 33 6863 7 0 7 0 21
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 1 4 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.36 0.33 0.39 11 6188 19 2 15 2 22
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1222 3 0 3 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.51 0.50 0.53 8 1113 7 3 4 0 8
3J16_L 0.29 0.23 0.37 7 2756 12 0 12 0 23
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2834 16 0 16 0 32
3JYX_3 0.62 0.63 0.61 17 6300 19 1 10 8 10
3JYX_4 0.35 0.30 0.42 10 12222 23 3 11 9 23
3JYX_5 - 0.35 0.32 0.39 286 5022127 525 142 310 73 607
3KIY_A - 0.43 0.34 0.55 424 4053360 352 20 324 8 817
3KTW_C - 0.74 0.63 0.87 27 4529 5 2 2 1 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.81 0.69 0.95 42 9136 3 0 2 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.64 0.54 0.78 14 1998 4 0 4 0 12
3NPB_A 0.77 0.65 0.91 30 6988 6 1 2 3 16
3O58_3 0.43 0.34 0.55 12 12381 17 0 10 7 23
3O58_2 0.74 0.74 0.74 28 7222 11 3 7 1 10
3PDR_A 0.69 0.56 0.85 40 12833 9 0 7 2 32
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.65 0.50 0.84 21 3891 4 1 3 0 21
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.51 0.32 0.80 12 3555 3 2 1 0 25
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 34 2 23 9 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.