CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.543 > 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.557 ± 0.168 > 0.510 ± 0.236
Sensitivity 0.456 > 0.422
Positive Predictive Value 0.652 > 0.642
Total TP 120 > 111
Total TN 33376 < 33387
Total FP 73 > 72
Total FP CONTRA 14 > 8
Total FP INCONS 50 < 54
Total FP COMP 9 < 10
Total FN 143 < 152
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 120
Total TN 33376
Total FP 73
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 50
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 143
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.557 ± 0.168
Sensitivity 0.456
Positive Predictive Value 0.652
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 2 3 0 13
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 2 7 0 22
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 33 5 20 8 28
4A1C_3 0.66 0.57 0.78 31 7100 9 1 8 0 23
4AOB_A 0.44 0.36 0.56 15 4344 13 1 11 1 27
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 111
Total TN 33387
Total FP 72
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 152
Total Scores
MCC 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.236
Sensitivity 0.422
Positive Predictive Value 0.642
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.