CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold Vsfold4
MCC 0.568 > 0.478
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.068 > 0.501 ± 0.072
Sensitivity 0.498 > 0.399
Positive Predictive Value 0.653 > 0.579
Total TP 933 > 748
Total TN 338564 < 338702
Total FP 553 < 604
Total FP CONTRA 84 > 59
Total FP INCONS 412 < 484
Total FP COMP 57 < 61
Total FN 942 < 1127
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 933
Total TN 338564
Total FP 553
Total FP CONTRA 84
Total FP INCONS 412
Total FP COMP 57
Total FN 942
Total Scores
MCC 0.568
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.068
Sensitivity 0.498
Positive Predictive Value 0.653
Nr of predictions 55

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - 0.45 0.25 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 15
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 2 3 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.79 0.89 31 6070 6 0 4 2 8
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.39 0.23 0.67 6 1944 3 2 1 0 20
2WW9_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 561 0 0 0 0 14
2WWQ_V 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 2905 4 0 2 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.78 0.70 0.86 19 2828 3 0 3 0 8
2ZZM_B 0.53 0.47 0.60 15 3461 10 2 8 0 17
2ZZN_D 0.82 0.78 0.88 21 2461 3 0 3 0 6
3A2K_C 0.44 0.43 0.46 12 2900 14 2 12 0 16
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.39 0.39 0.41 11 2674 17 4 12 1 17
3AM1_B - 0.68 0.63 0.73 22 3210 8 1 7 0 13
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3G4S_9 0.30 0.25 0.38 14 7344 23 1 22 0 43
3GCA_A - 0.49 0.29 0.83 5 522 1 0 1 0 12
3GX2_A 0.77 0.63 0.96 25 4345 2 0 1 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.80 0.67 0.96 22 4255 1 0 1 0 11
3IYQ_A 0.34 0.37 0.32 35 60615 80 21 55 4 59
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 60 70777 44 4 35 5 72
3IZF_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 33 6860 10 1 9 0 21
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 26 0 21 5 25
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 464 1 1 0 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.50 0.44 0.58 7 1116 5 2 3 0 9
3J16_L 0.46 0.40 0.55 12 2753 10 1 9 0 18
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2830 20 0 20 0 32
3JYX_4 0.20 0.21 0.20 7 12211 35 6 22 7 26
3JYX_3 0.28 0.30 0.27 8 6298 23 8 14 1 19
3KTW_C - 0.44 0.40 0.50 17 4526 18 2 15 1 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.81 0.72 0.92 44 9132 5 0 4 1 17
3NKB_B - 0.54 0.50 0.59 13 1994 9 0 9 0 13
3NPB_A 0.76 0.70 0.84 32 6983 8 1 5 2 14
3O58_2 0.78 0.76 0.81 29 7224 10 2 5 3 9
3O58_3 0.28 0.26 0.31 9 12374 20 3 17 0 26
3PDR_A 0.69 0.60 0.80 43 12826 13 0 11 2 29
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 2 7 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.46 0.77 17 3138 5 0 5 0 20
3UZL_B 0.70 0.54 0.91 20 3548 2 0 2 0 17
4A1C_3 0.66 0.57 0.78 31 7100 9 1 8 0 23
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 33 5 20 8 28
4AOB_A 0.44 0.36 0.56 15 4344 13 1 11 1 27
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 748
Total TN 338702
Total FP 604
Total FP CONTRA 59
Total FP INCONS 484
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 1127
Total Scores
MCC 0.478
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.501 ± 0.072
Sensitivity 0.399
Positive Predictive Value 0.579
Nr of predictions 55

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - 0.49 0.25 1.00 5 625 0 0 0 0 15
2KRL_A - 0.65 0.53 0.81 21 5125 7 0 5 2 19
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.31 0.28 0.34 11 6073 21 3 18 0 28
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WRQ_Y 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 2833 12 5 3 4 8
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.19 0.12 0.33 3 1944 6 0 6 0 23
2WW9_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 556 5 0 5 0 14
2WWQ_V 0.64 0.50 0.82 14 2909 4 0 3 1 14
2XQD_Y 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 7
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.24 6 3461 19 0 19 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.86 0.78 0.95 21 2463 1 0 1 0 6
3A2K_C 0.84 0.71 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 8
3A3A_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 27 3628 0 0 0 0 10
3ADB_C - 0.89 0.79 1.00 30 4156 0 0 0 0 8
3AKZ_H 0.67 0.57 0.80 16 2681 5 1 3 1 12
3AM1_B - 0.84 0.71 1.00 25 3215 0 0 0 0 10
3AMU_B 0.64 0.56 0.75 15 2983 7 0 5 2 12
3G4S_9 0.30 0.23 0.39 13 7348 20 1 19 0 44
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3GX2_A 0.50 0.40 0.64 16 4346 10 0 9 1 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.27 0.21 0.35 7 4258 13 1 12 0 26
3IYQ_A 0.29 0.29 0.29 27 60634 71 13 52 6 67
3IZ4_A 0.36 0.31 0.43 41 70780 59 7 48 4 91
3IZF_C 0.69 0.56 0.86 30 6868 5 0 5 0 24
3J0L_2 - 0.38 0.36 0.41 12 6187 18 3 14 1 21
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_7 - 0.51 0.41 0.64 7 1214 4 0 4 0 10
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 2 3 0 11
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2831 19 0 19 0 32
3JYX_4 0.10 0.09 0.12 3 12220 33 2 21 10 30
3JYX_3 0.60 0.56 0.65 15 6305 11 4 4 3 12
3KTW_C - 0.36 0.28 0.48 12 4535 13 3 10 0 31
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.28 0.23 0.35 14 9140 26 0 26 0 47
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.61 0.50 0.74 23 6990 9 0 8 1 23
3O58_2 0.47 0.42 0.53 16 7230 16 3 11 2 22
3O58_3 0.09 0.09 0.10 3 12373 35 5 22 8 32
3PDR_A 0.57 0.44 0.74 32 12837 13 0 11 2 40
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.19 0.17 0.24 7 3887 22 1 21 0 35
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.53 0.41 0.71 15 3549 6 1 5 0 22
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4A1C_2 0.28 0.24 0.33 8 11757 28 0 16 12 25
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1317 0 0 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.