CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold Vsfold5
MCC 0.568 > 0.426
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.068 > 0.446 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.498 > 0.359
Positive Predictive Value 0.653 > 0.512
Total TP 933 > 674
Total TN 338564 < 338677
Total FP 553 < 702
Total FP CONTRA 84 > 75
Total FP INCONS 412 < 567
Total FP COMP 57 < 60
Total FN 942 < 1201
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 933
Total TN 338564
Total FP 553
Total FP CONTRA 84
Total FP INCONS 412
Total FP COMP 57
Total FN 942
Total Scores
MCC 0.568
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.068
Sensitivity 0.498
Positive Predictive Value 0.653
Nr of predictions 55

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - 0.45 0.25 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 15
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 2 3 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.79 0.89 31 6070 6 0 4 2 8
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.39 0.23 0.67 6 1944 3 2 1 0 20
2WW9_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 561 0 0 0 0 14
2WWQ_V 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 2905 4 0 2 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.78 0.70 0.86 19 2828 3 0 3 0 8
2ZZM_B 0.53 0.47 0.60 15 3461 10 2 8 0 17
2ZZN_D 0.82 0.78 0.88 21 2461 3 0 3 0 6
3A2K_C 0.44 0.43 0.46 12 2900 14 2 12 0 16
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.39 0.39 0.41 11 2674 17 4 12 1 17
3AM1_B - 0.68 0.63 0.73 22 3210 8 1 7 0 13
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3G4S_9 0.30 0.25 0.38 14 7344 23 1 22 0 43
3GCA_A - 0.49 0.29 0.83 5 522 1 0 1 0 12
3GX2_A 0.77 0.63 0.96 25 4345 2 0 1 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.80 0.67 0.96 22 4255 1 0 1 0 11
3IYQ_A 0.34 0.37 0.32 35 60615 80 21 55 4 59
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 60 70777 44 4 35 5 72
3IZF_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 33 6860 10 1 9 0 21
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 26 0 21 5 25
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 464 1 1 0 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.50 0.44 0.58 7 1116 5 2 3 0 9
3J16_L 0.46 0.40 0.55 12 2753 10 1 9 0 18
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2830 20 0 20 0 32
3JYX_4 0.20 0.21 0.20 7 12211 35 6 22 7 26
3JYX_3 0.28 0.30 0.27 8 6298 23 8 14 1 19
3KTW_C - 0.44 0.40 0.50 17 4526 18 2 15 1 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.81 0.72 0.92 44 9132 5 0 4 1 17
3NKB_B - 0.54 0.50 0.59 13 1994 9 0 9 0 13
3NPB_A 0.76 0.70 0.84 32 6983 8 1 5 2 14
3O58_2 0.78 0.76 0.81 29 7224 10 2 5 3 9
3O58_3 0.28 0.26 0.31 9 12374 20 3 17 0 26
3PDR_A 0.69 0.60 0.80 43 12826 13 0 11 2 29
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 2 7 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.46 0.77 17 3138 5 0 5 0 20
3UZL_B 0.70 0.54 0.91 20 3548 2 0 2 0 17
4A1C_3 0.66 0.57 0.78 31 7100 9 1 8 0 23
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 33 5 20 8 28
4AOB_A 0.44 0.36 0.56 15 4344 13 1 11 1 27
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 674
Total TN 338677
Total FP 702
Total FP CONTRA 75
Total FP INCONS 567
Total FP COMP 60
Total FN 1201
Total Scores
MCC 0.426
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.446 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.359
Positive Predictive Value 0.512
Nr of predictions 55

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 397 0 0 0 0 2
2KFC_A - 0.48 0.35 0.70 7 620 3 0 3 0 13
2KRL_A - 0.57 0.50 0.65 20 5120 11 5 6 0 20
2KX8_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 846 0 0 0 0 3
2LA5_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 623 7 0 7 0 19
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.27 0.23 0.32 9 6077 19 2 17 0 30
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WRQ_Y 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 2833 12 5 3 4 8
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.15 0.12 0.21 3 1939 11 1 10 0 23
2WW9_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 556 5 0 5 0 14
2WWQ_V 0.64 0.50 0.82 14 2909 4 0 3 1 14
2XQD_Y 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 7
2ZZM_B 0.19 0.19 0.21 6 3458 22 1 21 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.86 0.78 0.95 21 2463 1 0 1 0 6
3A2K_C 0.84 0.71 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 8
3A3A_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 27 3628 0 0 0 0 10
3ADB_C - 0.67 0.53 0.87 20 4163 3 0 3 0 18
3AKZ_H 0.84 0.71 1.00 20 2681 0 0 0 0 8
3AM1_B - 0.78 0.71 0.86 25 3211 4 1 3 0 10
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3G4S_9 0.08 0.07 0.11 4 7344 33 0 33 0 53
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3GX2_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 16 4347 9 0 8 1 24
3IVN_B 0.76 0.58 1.00 18 2328 0 0 0 0 13
3IWN_A 0.25 0.21 0.30 7 4255 16 1 15 0 26
3IYQ_A 0.33 0.31 0.35 29 60642 61 15 40 6 65
3IZ4_A 0.29 0.24 0.36 32 70787 62 8 49 5 100
3IZF_C 0.70 0.56 0.88 30 6869 4 0 4 0 24
3J0L_2 - 0.35 0.33 0.37 11 6186 21 3 16 2 22
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 2 3 0 11
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2831 19 0 19 0 32
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 32 3 19 10 23
3JYX_3 0.17 0.15 0.20 4 6308 18 4 12 2 23
3KTW_C - 0.38 0.30 0.50 13 4534 13 3 10 0 30
3LA5_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2469 16 0 16 0 34
3NDB_M - 0.06 0.05 0.08 3 9144 33 1 32 0 58
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.57 0.46 0.72 21 6992 9 1 7 1 25
3O58_2 0.45 0.42 0.48 16 7227 19 3 14 2 22
3O58_3 0.39 0.37 0.41 13 12371 28 7 12 9 22
3PDR_A 0.57 0.44 0.74 32 12837 13 0 11 2 40
3RKF_A 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 2186 3 0 3 0 12
3SD1_A 0.11 0.10 0.15 4 3890 22 0 22 0 38
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.16 0.14 0.20 5 3545 20 1 19 0 32
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.24 8 11748 37 3 22 12 25
4AOB_A 0.18 0.14 0.25 6 4347 19 1 17 1 36
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.