CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Mastr(20)
MCC 0.661 > 0.566
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.122 > 0.522 ± 0.203
Sensitivity 0.553 > 0.384
Positive Predictive Value 0.796 < 0.840
Total TP 226 > 157
Total TN 58114 < 58211
Total FP 73 > 36
Total FP CONTRA 11 > 5
Total FP INCONS 47 > 25
Total FP COMP 15 > 6
Total FN 183 < 252
P-value 1.05690340753e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Mastr(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 226
Total TN 58114
Total FP 73
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 47
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 183
Total Scores
MCC 0.661
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.553
Positive Predictive Value 0.796
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2XQD_Y 0.81 0.78 0.84 21 2825 4 4 0 0 6
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3IZF_C 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 6867 6 0 6 0 24
3O58_2 0.80 0.68 0.93 26 7232 3 0 2 1 12
3O58_3 0.36 0.34 0.38 12 12371 29 5 15 9 23
3PDR_A 0.72 0.54 0.95 39 12839 4 0 2 2 33
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 157
Total TN 58211
Total FP 36
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 25
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 252
Total Scores
MCC 0.566
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.522 ± 0.203
Sensitivity 0.384
Positive Predictive Value 0.840
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3AMU_B 0.77 0.59 1.00 16 2987 1 0 0 1 11
3IZF_C 0.73 0.63 0.85 34 6863 7 1 5 1 20
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 12 3 6 3 9
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12403 0 0 0 0 35
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12880 0 0 0 0 72
3RKF_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2194 0 0 0 0 17
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
4AOB_A 0.39 0.26 0.58 11 4352 9 0 8 1 31
4ENB_A 0.39 0.16 1.00 3 1272 0 0 0 0 16
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.