CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.630 > 0.128
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.662 ± 0.138 > 0.052 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.519 > 0.022
Positive Predictive Value 0.773 > 0.750
Total TP 140 > 6
Total TN 23806 < 23979
Total FP 44 > 2
Total FP CONTRA 3 > 0
Total FP INCONS 38 > 2
Total FP COMP 3 > 0
Total FN 130 < 264
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 23806
Total FP 44
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 130
Total Scores
MCC 0.630
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.662 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.519
Positive Predictive Value 0.773
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
3UZL_B 0.45 0.38 0.54 14 3544 12 1 11 0 23
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 6
Total TN 23979
Total FP 2
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 2
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 264
Total Scores
MCC 0.128
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.052 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.022
Positive Predictive Value 0.750
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.