CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.645 > 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.210 > 0.539 ± 0.293
Sensitivity 0.528 > 0.426
Positive Predictive Value 0.795 > 0.728
Total TP 93 > 75
Total TN 14522 < 14536
Total FP 25 < 29
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 5
Total FP INCONS 22 < 23
Total FP COMP 1 = 1
Total FN 83 < 101
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 93
Total TN 14522
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 83
Total Scores
MCC 0.645
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.210
Sensitivity 0.528
Positive Predictive Value 0.795
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 75
Total TN 14536
Total FP 29
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.293
Sensitivity 0.426
Positive Predictive Value 0.728
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.