CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for HotKnots & McQFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric HotKnots McQFold
MCC 0.569 > 0.523
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.569 ± 0.069 > 0.529 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.506 > 0.449
Positive Predictive Value 0.644 > 0.613
Total TP 949 > 842
Total TN 338519 < 338620
Total FP 591 > 574
Total FP CONTRA 86 > 85
Total FP INCONS 439 < 446
Total FP COMP 66 > 43
Total FN 926 < 1033
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of HotKnots and McQFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and McQFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and McQFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for HotKnots and McQFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and McQFold).

^top





Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 949
Total TN 338519
Total FP 591
Total FP CONTRA 86
Total FP INCONS 439
Total FP COMP 66
Total FN 926
Total Scores
MCC 0.569
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.569 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.644
Nr of predictions 55

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 623 7 0 7 0 20
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.14 0.12 0.19 3 1937 13 0 13 0 23
2WW9_E - 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 557 0 0 0 0 10
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.68 0.86 19 2904 5 0 3 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.25 6 3462 18 0 18 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.82 0.78 0.88 21 2461 3 0 3 0 6
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.79 0.74 0.85 28 4153 5 0 5 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.43 0.39 0.48 11 2678 12 2 10 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.78 0.71 0.86 25 3211 4 0 4 0 10
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3G4S_9 0.50 0.39 0.65 22 7347 12 1 11 0 35
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3GX2_A 0.68 0.55 0.85 22 4345 5 0 4 1 18
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.63 0.58 0.70 19 4251 9 0 8 1 14
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60617 81 22 55 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.51 0.47 0.55 62 70763 52 10 41 1 70
3IZF_C 0.70 0.61 0.80 33 6862 8 1 7 0 21
3J0L_2 - 0.28 0.27 0.29 9 6185 23 3 19 1 24
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 1 4 0 4
3J0L_7 - 0.28 0.29 0.29 5 1208 12 0 12 0 12
3J0L_a - 0.51 0.50 0.53 8 1113 7 3 4 0 8
3J16_L 0.26 0.23 0.30 7 2752 16 1 15 0 23
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2828 22 1 21 0 32
3JYX_4 0.32 0.30 0.33 10 12216 31 5 15 11 23
3JYX_3 0.62 0.63 0.61 17 6300 22 1 10 11 10
3KTW_C - 0.73 0.63 0.84 27 4528 6 2 3 1 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.78 0.65 0.94 30 6989 5 0 2 3 16
3O58_2 0.71 0.71 0.71 27 7222 12 4 7 1 11
3O58_3 0.23 0.26 0.21 9 12360 34 10 24 0 26
3PDR_A 0.67 0.56 0.82 40 12831 11 0 9 2 32
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 6 25 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top



Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 842
Total TN 338620
Total FP 574
Total FP CONTRA 85
Total FP INCONS 446
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 1033
Total Scores
MCC 0.523
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.529 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.449
Positive Predictive Value 0.613
Nr of predictions 55

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - 0.49 0.25 1.00 5 625 0 0 0 0 15
2KRL_A - 0.59 0.53 0.68 21 5120 13 3 7 3 19
2KX8_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 845 1 0 1 0 3
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.51 0.46 0.58 18 6074 13 2 11 0 21
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.71 0.60 0.86 6 293 1 0 1 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.32 0.23 0.46 6 1940 7 2 5 0 20
2WW9_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 556 5 0 5 0 14
2WWQ_V 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 28
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.24 6 3461 19 2 17 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 2 0 2 0 6
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 1 0 0 1 6
3AKZ_H 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2679 6 1 4 1 11
3AM1_B - 0.91 0.83 1.00 29 3211 1 0 0 1 6
3AMU_B 0.75 0.59 0.94 16 2986 3 0 1 2 11
3G4S_9 0.27 0.21 0.36 12 7348 21 1 20 0 45
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3GX2_A 0.47 0.40 0.57 16 4343 13 1 11 1 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.20 0.18 0.24 6 4253 19 2 17 0 27
3IYQ_A 0.28 0.31 0.26 29 60614 87 19 64 4 65
3IZ4_A 0.42 0.36 0.49 47 70780 53 6 43 4 85
3IZF_C 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 6867 6 0 6 0 24
3J0L_2 - 0.26 0.24 0.30 8 6189 21 0 19 2 25
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1215 10 0 10 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.26 0.19 0.38 3 1120 5 1 4 0 13
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2830 20 0 20 0 32
3JYX_4 0.20 0.21 0.19 7 12210 33 8 21 4 26
3JYX_3 0.21 0.22 0.20 6 6298 24 9 15 0 21
3KTW_C - 0.36 0.30 0.45 13 4531 17 1 15 1 30
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.81 0.70 0.93 43 9134 4 1 2 1 18
3NKB_B - 0.36 0.31 0.44 8 1998 10 1 9 0 18
3NPB_A 0.81 0.67 0.97 31 6989 4 1 0 3 15
3O58_2 0.83 0.71 0.96 27 7232 2 0 1 1 11
3O58_3 0.26 0.26 0.26 9 12368 26 10 16 0 26
3PDR_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 40 12834 9 0 6 3 32
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.71 0.60 0.86 25 3887 4 0 4 0 17
3U4M_B - 0.73 0.57 0.95 21 3138 1 0 1 0 16
3UZL_B 0.45 0.41 0.52 15 3541 14 0 14 0 22
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 33 5 23 5 28
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.