CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for HotKnots & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric HotKnots TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.609 > 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.649 ± 0.199 > 0.602 ± 0.154
Sensitivity 0.526 > 0.470
Positive Predictive Value 0.710 < 0.756
Total TP 142 > 127
Total TN 34823 < 34855
Total FP 72 > 53
Total FP CONTRA 11 > 3
Total FP INCONS 47 > 38
Total FP COMP 14 > 12
Total FN 128 < 143
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of HotKnots and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for HotKnots and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 142
Total TN 34823
Total FP 72
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 47
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 128
Total Scores
MCC 0.609
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.649 ± 0.199
Sensitivity 0.526
Positive Predictive Value 0.710
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 6 25 11 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 127
Total TN 34855
Total FP 53
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 143
Total Scores
MCC 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.602 ± 0.154
Sensitivity 0.470
Positive Predictive Value 0.756
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 28 0 19 9 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.