CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot Afold
MCC 0.567 > 0.516
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.514 ± 0.307 > 0.498 ± 0.317
Sensitivity 0.462 < 0.467
Positive Predictive Value 0.702 > 0.578
Total TP 92 < 93
Total TN 27166 > 27136
Total FP 45 < 84
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 7
Total FP INCONS 33 < 61
Total FP COMP 6 < 16
Total FN 107 > 106
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Afold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Afold).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 92
Total TN 27166
Total FP 45
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 107
Total Scores
MCC 0.567
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.514 ± 0.307
Sensitivity 0.462
Positive Predictive Value 0.702
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.77 0.91 30 6072 4 0 3 1 9
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.68 0.54 0.87 20 3137 3 1 2 0 17
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 93
Total TN 27136
Total FP 84
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 61
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 106
Total Scores
MCC 0.516
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.498 ± 0.317
Sensitivity 0.467
Positive Predictive Value 0.578
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1210 15 1 14 0 17
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.