CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.567 > 0.558
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.142 > 0.492 ± 0.164
Sensitivity 0.463 > 0.402
Positive Predictive Value 0.702 < 0.783
Total TP 233 > 202
Total TN 60875 < 60949
Total FP 110 > 65
Total FP CONTRA 12 > 5
Total FP INCONS 87 > 51
Total FP COMP 11 > 9
Total FN 270 < 301
P-value 0.000619290629009

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 233
Total TN 60875
Total FP 110
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 87
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 270
Total Scores
MCC 0.567
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.463
Positive Predictive Value 0.702
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.77 0.91 30 6072 4 0 3 1 9
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.19 0.25 3 1116 9 1 8 0 13
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.48 0.80 20 3891 5 0 5 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.68 0.54 0.87 20 3137 3 1 2 0 17
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 202
Total TN 60949
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 301
Total Scores
MCC 0.558
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.492 ± 0.164
Sensitivity 0.402
Positive Predictive Value 0.783
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6101 4 0 4 0 39
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 3 0 3 0 16
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.24 1.00 8 6208 0 0 0 0 25
3J0L_7 - 0.60 0.41 0.88 7 1217 1 0 1 0 10
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.43 0.80 16 3140 4 0 4 0 21
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.