CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot MCFold
MCC 0.570 > 0.449
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.498 ± 0.160 > 0.403 ± 0.146
Sensitivity 0.469 < 0.474
Positive Predictive Value 0.698 > 0.434
Total TP 199 < 201
Total TN 52981 > 52803
Total FP 96 < 298
Total FP CONTRA 11 < 39
Total FP INCONS 75 < 223
Total FP COMP 10 < 36
Total FN 225 > 223
P-value 1.02533530638e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and MCFold).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 199
Total TN 52981
Total FP 96
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 225
Total Scores
MCC 0.570
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.498 ± 0.160
Sensitivity 0.469
Positive Predictive Value 0.698
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.77 0.91 30 6072 4 0 3 1 9
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.19 0.25 3 1116 9 1 8 0 13
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.48 0.80 20 3891 5 0 5 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.68 0.54 0.87 20 3137 3 1 2 0 17
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 201
Total TN 52803
Total FP 298
Total FP CONTRA 39
Total FP INCONS 223
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 223
Total Scores
MCC 0.449
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.403 ± 0.146
Sensitivity 0.474
Positive Predictive Value 0.434
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.92 0.95 36 6067 14 0 2 12 3
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3J0L_g - 0.13 0.25 0.08 1 452 12 8 4 0 3
3J0L_2 - 0.21 0.24 0.18 8 6172 39 7 29 3 25
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.19 0.17 3 1110 15 1 14 0 13
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1206 19 4 15 0 17
3J16_L 0.45 0.47 0.44 14 2743 19 1 17 1 16
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.59 0.59 22 3123 15 0 15 0 15
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.