CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot NanoFolder
MCC 0.594 > 0.366
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.576 ± 0.165 > 0.390 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.486 > 0.376
Positive Predictive Value 0.733 > 0.364
Total TP 151 > 117
Total TN 41562 > 41447
Total FP 62 < 214
Total FP CONTRA 8 < 30
Total FP INCONS 47 < 174
Total FP COMP 7 < 10
Total FN 160 < 194
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 151
Total TN 41562
Total FP 62
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 47
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 160
Total Scores
MCC 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.576 ± 0.165
Sensitivity 0.486
Positive Predictive Value 0.733
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.77 0.91 30 6072 4 0 3 1 9
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3U4M_B - 0.68 0.54 0.87 20 3137 3 1 2 0 17
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 117
Total TN 41447
Total FP 214
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 174
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 194
Total Scores
MCC 0.366
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.390 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.376
Positive Predictive Value 0.364
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.55 0.50 11 1518 11 0 11 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.29 0.33 0.25 13 6054 38 8 30 0 26
3J16_L 0.36 0.37 0.37 11 2745 19 3 16 0 19
3U4M_B - 0.61 0.57 0.66 21 3128 11 1 10 0 16
3UZL_B 0.36 0.35 0.38 13 3536 21 3 18 0 24
4A1C_3 0.48 0.46 0.51 25 7091 24 2 22 0 29
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11728 61 12 41 8 33
4AOB_A 0.33 0.29 0.39 12 4340 20 1 18 1 30
4ENC_A 0.57 0.58 0.58 11 1307 9 0 8 1 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.