CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot RDfolder
MCC 0.543 > 0.302
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.466 ± 0.197 > 0.239 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.426 > 0.219
Positive Predictive Value 0.701 > 0.434
Total TP 115 > 59
Total TN 23071 < 23099
Total FP 52 < 80
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 7
Total FP INCONS 45 < 70
Total FP COMP 3 = 3
Total FN 155 < 211
P-value 1.43692248862e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 115
Total TN 23071
Total FP 52
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 155
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.466 ± 0.197
Sensitivity 0.426
Positive Predictive Value 0.701
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.19 0.25 3 1116 9 1 8 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.48 0.80 20 3891 5 0 5 0 22
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 59
Total TN 23099
Total FP 80
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 211
Total Scores
MCC 0.302
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.239 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.219
Positive Predictive Value 0.434
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 4 1 3 0 16
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.