CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MCFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MCFold & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MCFold NanoFolder
MCC 0.529 > 0.373
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.496 ± 0.247 > 0.403 ± 0.196
Sensitivity 0.552 > 0.397
Positive Predictive Value 0.514 > 0.359
Total TP 128 > 92
Total TN 33578 > 33571
Total FP 154 < 173
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 26
Total FP INCONS 107 < 138
Total FP COMP 33 > 9
Total FN 104 < 140
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MCFold and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MCFold and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of MCFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 33578
Total FP 154
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 107
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 104
Total Scores
MCC 0.529
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.496 ± 0.247
Sensitivity 0.552
Positive Predictive Value 0.514
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.92 0.95 36 6067 14 0 2 12 3
3J16_L 0.45 0.47 0.44 14 2743 19 1 17 1 16
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.59 0.59 22 3123 15 0 15 0 15
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 92
Total TN 33571
Total FP 173
Total FP CONTRA 26
Total FP INCONS 138
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 140
Total Scores
MCC 0.373
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.403 ± 0.196
Sensitivity 0.397
Positive Predictive Value 0.359
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.55 0.50 11 1518 11 0 11 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.29 0.33 0.25 13 6054 38 8 30 0 26
3J16_L 0.36 0.37 0.37 11 2745 19 3 16 0 19
3U4M_B - 0.61 0.57 0.66 21 3128 11 1 10 0 16
4A1C_3 0.48 0.46 0.51 25 7091 24 2 22 0 29
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11728 61 12 41 8 33
4ENC_A 0.57 0.58 0.58 11 1307 9 0 8 1 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.