CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MCFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MCFold & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MCFold PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.454 > 0.115
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.448 ± 0.146 > 0.061 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.471 > 0.025
Positive Predictive Value 0.446 < 0.538
Total TP 131 > 7
Total TN 34673 < 34954
Total FP 184 > 25
Total FP CONTRA 19 > 0
Total FP INCONS 144 > 6
Total FP COMP 21 > 19
Total FN 147 < 271
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MCFold and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MCFold and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of MCFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 131
Total TN 34673
Total FP 184
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 144
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 147
Total Scores
MCC 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.448 ± 0.146
Sensitivity 0.471
Positive Predictive Value 0.446
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3J16_L 0.45 0.47 0.44 14 2743 19 1 17 1 16
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 7
Total TN 34954
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 271
Total Scores
MCC 0.115
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.061 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.025
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.