CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MCFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MCFold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MCFold RNAwolf
MCC 0.449 > 0.390
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.403 ± 0.146 > 0.367 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.474 > 0.366
Positive Predictive Value 0.434 > 0.425
Total TP 201 > 155
Total TN 52803 < 52901
Total FP 298 > 229
Total FP CONTRA 39 > 26
Total FP INCONS 223 > 184
Total FP COMP 36 > 19
Total FN 223 < 269
P-value 2.1413769576e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MCFold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MCFold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of MCFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 201
Total TN 52803
Total FP 298
Total FP CONTRA 39
Total FP INCONS 223
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 223
Total Scores
MCC 0.449
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.403 ± 0.146
Sensitivity 0.474
Positive Predictive Value 0.434
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.92 0.95 36 6067 14 0 2 12 3
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3J0L_g - 0.13 0.25 0.08 1 452 12 8 4 0 3
3J0L_2 - 0.21 0.24 0.18 8 6172 39 7 29 3 25
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.19 0.17 3 1110 15 1 14 0 13
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1206 19 4 15 0 17
3J16_L 0.45 0.47 0.44 14 2743 19 1 17 1 16
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.59 0.59 22 3123 15 0 15 0 15
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 155
Total TN 52901
Total FP 229
Total FP CONTRA 26
Total FP INCONS 184
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 269
Total Scores
MCC 0.390
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.367 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.366
Positive Predictive Value 0.425
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.74 0.88 29 6072 8 0 4 4 10
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J0L_g - 0.16 0.25 0.11 1 456 8 6 2 0 3
3J0L_2 - 0.11 0.12 0.11 4 6181 34 5 26 3 29
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.19 0.20 3 1113 12 1 11 0 13
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3U4M_B - 0.44 0.38 0.52 14 3133 13 0 13 0 23
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.