CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) Vsfold5
MCC 0.621 > 0.425
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.633 ± 0.075 > 0.475 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.518 > 0.358
Positive Predictive Value 0.748 > 0.511
Total TP 510 > 352
Total TN 198723 > 198716
Total FP 252 < 388
Total FP CONTRA 31 < 38
Total FP INCONS 141 < 299
Total FP COMP 80 > 51
Total FN 474 < 632
P-value 5.02343278931e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 510
Total TN 198723
Total FP 252
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 141
Total FP COMP 80
Total FN 474
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.633 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3A2K_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 16 2905 6 1 4 1 12
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 2 0 0 2 7
3G4S_9 0.52 0.40 0.68 23 7347 13 1 10 2 34
3GX2_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 23 4344 5 0 4 1 17
3IVN_B 0.74 0.58 0.95 18 2327 1 1 0 0 13
3IZ4_A 0.51 0.41 0.64 54 70791 32 7 24 1 78
3IZF_C 0.67 0.59 0.76 32 6861 11 1 9 1 22
3JYV_7 0.79 0.63 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_3 0.55 0.52 0.58 14 6304 23 0 10 13 13
3JYX_4 0.33 0.30 0.37 10 12219 32 2 15 15 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.69 0.59 0.82 27 6988 9 1 5 3 19
3O58_2 0.74 0.74 0.74 28 7222 13 4 6 3 10
3O58_3 0.52 0.40 0.67 14 12382 17 2 5 10 21
3PDR_A 0.71 0.57 0.89 41 12834 9 0 5 4 31
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 2 6 0 19
4A1C_3 0.64 0.56 0.75 30 7100 11 2 8 1 24
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 36 2 17 17 28
4AOB_A 0.62 0.55 0.72 23 4339 10 0 9 1 19
4ENB_A 0.26 0.11 0.67 2 1272 1 0 1 0 17
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 352
Total TN 198716
Total FP 388
Total FP CONTRA 38
Total FP INCONS 299
Total FP COMP 51
Total FN 632
Total Scores
MCC 0.425
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.475 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.358
Positive Predictive Value 0.511
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 397 0 0 0 0 2
2WRQ_Y 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 2833 12 5 3 4 8
2XQD_Y 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 7
3A2K_C 0.84 0.71 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 8
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3G4S_9 0.08 0.07 0.11 4 7344 33 0 33 0 53
3GX2_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 16 4347 9 0 8 1 24
3IVN_B 0.76 0.58 1.00 18 2328 0 0 0 0 13
3IZ4_A 0.29 0.24 0.36 32 70787 62 8 49 5 100
3IZF_C 0.70 0.56 0.88 30 6869 4 0 4 0 24
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2831 19 0 19 0 32
3JYX_3 0.17 0.15 0.20 4 6308 18 4 12 2 23
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 32 3 19 10 23
3LA5_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2469 16 0 16 0 34
3NPB_A 0.57 0.46 0.72 21 6992 9 1 7 1 25
3O58_2 0.45 0.42 0.48 16 7227 19 3 14 2 22
3O58_3 0.39 0.37 0.41 13 12371 28 7 12 9 22
3PDR_A 0.57 0.44 0.74 32 12837 13 0 11 2 40
3RKF_A 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 2186 3 0 3 0 12
3SD1_A 0.11 0.10 0.15 4 3890 22 0 22 0 38
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.24 8 11748 37 3 22 12 25
4AOB_A 0.18 0.14 0.25 6 4347 19 1 17 1 36
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.