CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) RNASLOpt
MCC 0.586 > 0.474
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.516 ± 0.223 > 0.505 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.457 > 0.374
Positive Predictive Value 0.758 > 0.609
Total TP 116 > 95
Total TN 33625 > 33622
Total FP 52 < 67
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 11
Total FP INCONS 33 < 50
Total FP COMP 15 > 6
Total FN 138 < 159
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNASLOpt).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 116
Total TN 33625
Total FP 52
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 138
Total Scores
MCC 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.516 ± 0.223
Sensitivity 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.758
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 12 0 10 2 20
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3UZL_B 0.66 0.49 0.90 18 3550 2 1 1 0 19
4A1C_3 0.75 0.65 0.88 35 7100 5 1 4 0 19
4A1C_2 0.35 0.24 0.50 8 11765 20 1 7 12 25
4AOB_A 0.66 0.55 0.79 23 4342 7 0 6 1 19
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 1 3 0 13

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 95
Total TN 33622
Total FP 67
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 50
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 159
Total Scores
MCC 0.474
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.505 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.374
Positive Predictive Value 0.609
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
3J16_L 0.53 0.40 0.71 12 2758 5 0 5 0 18
3UZL_B 0.48 0.32 0.71 12 3553 5 0 5 0 25
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.